Gottman Connect

The Gottman Relationship Checkup measures specific strengths and challenges that couples face in their relationship and in their individual lives. Dr. Gottman's lab began designing many of these assessment questionnaires in 1980 and it has taken decades of diligent research to harness this knowledge into a streamlined assessment tool.

Before this tool was built, Dr. Gottman needed to know that The Sound Relationship House questionnaires, which are included in the Gottman Relationship Checkup, accurately measure what they purport to measure. For example, if there is a challenge in Fondness and Admiration for one partner but not the other, he needed to be confident that we would actually see less respect and more contempt in a SPAFF coding of the couple’s Conflict Interaction and/or a Buehlman Coding of the couple’s Oral History Interview. He is delighted to report that this is indeed the case.

The Gottman Relationship Checkup contains several additional questionnaires, some of which are in the process of being tested and validated. Below is a chart, with a list of the questionnaires used in the Gottman Relationship Checkup, which show whether cutoff scores are based on psychometric data or on clinical experience while normative data is being collected. Cutoff scores may change as new data is collected. An asterisk indicates that the questionnaire is a Gottman Sound Relationship House scale. Every questionnaire needs to be interpreted in the context of all the other information gained during the assessment process.

Relationship Checkup Questionnaire

* Gottman Sound Relationship House scales. Psychometric properties are available at johngottman.net.
Cut off scores are based on:		Subsection
Psychometric Data	Clinical Experience	Subsection
		Global Relationship Satisfaction Inventory
		Weiss-Cerreto Relationship Status Inventory
		* Love Maps
		* Fondness and Admiration System
		* Turning Towards or Away
		Satisfaction with Passion and Romance in Your Relationship
		Satisfaction with the Quality of Your Sex Life
		Satisfaction with the Frequency of Sex in Your Relationship
		* Emotional Disengagement and Loneliness
		The Detour Scales Subsection
		Chaos and Control
		Trust in the Relationship
		Commitment
		Meta-Emotions
		The Conflict Scales Subsection
		* Harsh Startup
		* The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
		* Flooding
		* Accepting Influence
		* Compromise
		* Negative Sentiment Override
		* Repair Attempts
		My Family History
		Areas Scale One: Emotional Connection
		Areas Scale Two: Stress
		Areas Scale Three: Relatives and Extended Family
		Areas Scale Four: Jealousy
		Areas Scale Five: Emotional or Sexual Affairs
		Areas Scale Six: Basic Values and Goals
		Areas Scale Seven: Housework and Childcare
		Areas Scale Eight: Financial Issues
		Areas Scale Nine: Having Fun Together
		Areas Scale Ten: Spirituality, Religion, Ethics
		Areas Scale Eleven: Children
		Areas Scale Twelve: Distressing Events
		*Gridlock On Perpetual Issues
		Shared Meaning Subsection
		*Rituals of Connection
		*Shared Meaning - Roles in Life
		*Shared Meaning - Goals
		*Shared Meaning - Symbols
		Individual Areas of Concern Subsection
		Drug & Alcohol Abuse
		Drug & Alcohol Frequency Screening
		Suicide Potential
		Domestic Violence Situational
		Domestic Violence Characterological
		Social Isolation
		Degradation and Humiliation
		Sexual Coercion
		Property Damage
		Somatization
		Obsessive-Compulsive
		Interpersonal Sensitivity
		Depression
		Anxiety
		Anger-Hostility
		Phobic Anxiety
		Paranoid Ideation
		Psychoticism
		Poor Appetite
		Trouble Falling Asleep
		Awakening Early Morning
		Restless or Disturbed Sleep
		Thoughts of Death or Dying
		Overeating
		Feelings of Guilt

Psychometric properties may be found in the following references:

Connor JP, Grier M, Feeney GF, Young RM. (2007). The validity of the Brief Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (bMAST) as a problem drinking severity measure. J Stud Alcohol Drugs, 68(5), 771-79.

Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L. (1973). SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale--preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9(1), 13-28.

Gottman, John. The reliability and validity of the sound relationship house questionnaires. Unpublished document. The article is available here.

Whiting, J.B. & Crane, D.R. (2003). Distress and Divorce: Establishing Cutoff Scores for the Marital Status Inventory. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(2), 195 – 205.

Psychometrics for the Relationship Checkup

Relationship Checkup Questionnaire